Most expensive homes in the world

Soooo, Forbes have just listed the ten most expensive homes for sale IN THE WORLD at the moment. At #1 is the Spelling home in California valued at $150 million. Take a look at the picture — I do not pay that much money to have neighbours!!!!

For a little less bread ($117 mill.) you can live here at Updown Court in Surrey — no neighbours, stereo up loud, said to be larger than both Buckingham Palace or Hampton Court, this 103-room home has 58 acres of gardens and woodlands, probably got Kate Beckinsale living next door, winner…

But this one’s for me, ’cause I’m a sucker for some Cote D’Azur — it’s the Villa Leopolda going cheap at $102 million. Bargain!!!

That’s to cheer you all up after the pollution photos from China.

Hell on Earth: The Unseen Side of China’s Modernisation

Longmen town in Hanchen city, Shaanxi Province (陕西省韩城市龙门镇) has large-scaled industrial development. Environment is very seriously polluted there. April 8, 2008

In Inner Mongolia there were 2 “black dragons” from the Lasengmiao Power Plant (内蒙古拉僧庙发电厂) covering the nearby villages. July 26, 2005

There doesn’t seem to be any way around the fact that if a country wants to industrialise on a massive scale, pollution is an unfortunate and initially uncontrollable by-product. It’s a pattern that’s been repeated around the world many times in many places. Most of the rivers of Europe, Russia and the US were hugely polluted to the extent they were devoid of aquatic life as these areas industrialised. Cleanup comes later, driven by protest and legislation, but initially it is secondary to production.

The photographs show that China’s industrialisation is no different. They capture a modern version of the Dickensian nightmare experienced by many of the major English cities during industrialisation in the 19th century.

These photographs act not only as a documentation of this process of modernisation, but also as a form of protest and therefore as a potential catalyst for change. For this reason, on October 14, 2009, at the 30th annual awards ceremony of the W. Eugene Smith Memorial Fund in New York City the photographer Lu Guang (卢广) from People’s Republic of China won the $30,000 W. Eugene Smith Grant in Humanistic Photography. His documentary project is aptly titled “Pollution in China.”

For all additional photographs, click here.

Fan Jai Zhuang in Anyang City, Henan province, (河南安阳市范家庄) there is only one wall separating this village from the steelmaking furnaces. The villagers live in this heavily polluted environment where the village is under the iron rain every day. March 24, 2008

Guiyu, Guangdong province, (广东省贵屿镇) rivers and reservoirs have been contaminated, the villager is washing in a seriously polluted pond. November 25, 2005

In Ma’anshan, Anhui province (安徽马鞍山), along the Yangtze River there are many small-scaled Iron selection factories and plastic processing plants. Large amounts of sewage discharged into the Yangtze River June 18, 2009

Soil by Yangtze River, was polluted by Anhui Province Ma’anshan Chemical Industrial District (安徽省马鞍山化工园区). June 26, 2009

Hebei Province Shexian Tianjin Iron and steel plant (河北省涉县天津钢铁厂) is a heavily polluting company. Company scale is still growing, seriously affecting the lives of local residents. March 18, 2008

Share Share

The Magnificent Pyramids of Giza

Given our recent interest in archaeology here at The Notes after we reported on Lost Army Found I felt I had to post this video of the Pyramids at Giza.

They’re the only survivor from the original list of the Ancient Seven Wonders of the World you know…

I’ll have the Lawrence of Arabia with extra pineapple please.

Symbolism in Action: Seven tons of World Trade Center steel in the USS New York

Below is a follow-up to an earlier post: Controlling the symbols of power: Who decides?

*****************************************

I’m all for recycling, and steel is one of those materials that can be used over and over again. There was around 200,000 tons of steel in the World Trade Center buildings, and much of it was shipped off to India and China to be reused. And because it is steel—an inanimate material—it doesn’t care where it came from or where it ends up. Therefore, there is never any need to record its historical lineage.

So why is it that last week with the launch of the American navy’s newest ship, the USS New York, we were informed that seven tons of steel from the WTC has been used in the boat’s construction? Why has the steel from a destroyed building been deliberately integrated into a machine of war?  And why does the USS New York have “Never Forget” engraved on its bow?

Steel from the World Trade Center is forged into the bow of the ship, which bears a crest featuring a phoenix rising from the twin towers and the words “Never Forget” (New York Times).

The inclusion of this metal is obviously not accidental, so it must have some deeper ideological purpose. But, before we delve into this more closely, let’s start by looking at the amount of steel used – all seven tons of it. What we can say is that the actual amount neither matters nor is symbolic in any way. It could have been seven ounces, seventy tons or seven thousand tons of steel from the WTC – doesn’t matter. The US government and military only had to include some steel—any steel—from the WTC in order to achieve their desired end here. And their desired end was to add a symbolic component to the ship, to give it sense of mission and history that it would not otherwise have:

The memory of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, hangs heavy over the U.S.S. New York, which has been described variously as a tribute to the victims and an instrument of their vengeance.

So why do  this? Well, psychoanalysts and advertisers have long known that if you want to influence people, don’t appeal to their rationality, appeal to their emotions. Don’t allow them to think; instead, play on their feelings. And the best way to do this is through symbols! Symbols have always been important means for controlling populations and binding them to the dominant power structures. Why else do countries have national flags and why else do countries ban symbols such as swastikas and hammers-and-sickles?

In the case of the USS New York, then, symbolism engenders a greater sense of patriotism in those who serve on board – it links the crew to a critical historical moment in US history, and it links them not through any rationality, but through their emotions. Perfect for the armed forces as they don’t want their underlings thinking too much. In this example, symbolism functions as a form of control – it binds the crew to an idea that military service is as much an act of vengeance as it is of protection. And let’s face it, vengeance is a pretty powerful psychological motivator.

This symbolic inclusion of WTC steel in the USS New York also carries over its effects into the wider public sphere. Look at the following reactions to this inanimate steel:

Steel from the World Trade Center was melted down in a foundry in Amite , LA to cast the ship’s bow section. When it was poured into the molds on Sept 9, 2003, “those big rough steelworkers treated it with total reverence,” recalled Navy Capt. Kevin Wensing, who was there. “It was a spiritual moment for everybody there.”

Junior Chavers, foundry operations manager, said that when the trade center steel first arrived, he touched it with his hand and the “hair on my neck stood up. It had a big meaning to it for all of us,” he said. “They knocked us down. They can’t keep us down. We’re going to be back…

The expressions used here, such as “spiritual moment” and “big meaning”,  to describe personal reactions to the steel, demonstrate how powerfully such symbolic acts contribute to the wider militarisation of the American cultural psyche. This militarisation is a project that has been ongoing since the end of WWII and its effects are visible everywhere: the way in which military service is seen as a “good” (except for the children of politicians); the way in which “I support the troops” has become a robotic mantra used across the political spectrum regardless of the way in which the troops have behaved; the way in which the U.S. president is called the Commander-in-Chief; the way in which the military/industrial complex is threaded through the American economy.

No, there is no other liberal democracy that celebrates militarism quite like the U.S. Perhaps this is enabled by a public that bends over willingly and accepts the symbols fed to it without thinking.

Let’s now turn our attention to the imperative “Never forget” etched into the bow of the USS New York. Without the accompanying story of the WTC steel, this, of course, would be a meaningless command. “Never forget!” Interesting phrase that. Catchy.

It’s also the inverse of another “command” we’ve heard in the last couple of years and that is “Move on!”  We’ve been constantly told to “move on” from questioning the actions of the CIA, of the military and of politicians during the Bush years.

“Move on.” “Forget about it.” “Don’t keep bringing that up.”

So on the one hand, we have a country determined not to forget—“Never forget!”—about the atrocities committed against it, On the other hand, it actively wants to forget—“Move on!”—about the atrocities committed by it. You see how history is malleable? Selective? Why, when you put it like that, it’s like lying about work experience on your CV, isn’t it, only on a much bigger scale.

My point here is that those in positions of power actively engage in the production of symbols and that these symbols are  designed not only to manipulate their publics but also to reinforce a selective, self-serving, narrative of the nation.

And if you think I’m making too much of a big deal about this and the way in which symbols get used generally, then ask yourself this: Would American sailors have the same attachment to a naval vessel with seven tons of steel stripped from the prison at Abu Ghraib with the words “Never Forget” tattooed on its superstructure as a constant reminder of U.S. illegality and atrocity?

I think not.

Man Bites Shark

The National Geographic Society’s historical mission has been to “increase and diffuse geographic knowledge while promoting the conservation of the world’s cultural, historical, and natural resources”. More recently their President, John M. Fahey Jr put it more succinctly when he said the Society’s purpose was “to inspire people to care about their planet”.

But are the demands of commercial television at odds with these stated aims?

Chris Fischer shows off his scientific equipment.

Promotion for National Geographic Television’s Expedition Week has been heavily focussed around Expedition Great White…

A hundred sixty miles off the coast of Baja California, a team of world-class anglers will land one of the most challenging fish imaginable: the great white shark. Unlike any other catch ever attempted, they’ll lift an SUV-sized shark onto a platform, mount a long-lasting tracking tag by hand, take measurements and DNA samples, and release it unharmed… all within minutes. Marine biologist Dr. Michael Domeier uses advanced tracking devices to help uncover how this predator lives, with the ultimate goal of conserving and protecting this endangered species

The programmers at National Geographic know well enough that sharks, particularly “SUV-sized” ones are ratings gold but is getting a “team of world-class anglers”, in this case TV fishing personality Chris Fischer and Fast and Furious actor Paul Walker, to catch them scientifically necessary or in the best interests of the shark? A lot of experts think the expedition is potentially doing the animals, which included one enormous 4,200 pound female, more harm to  than good.

If this fish actually was an SUV you could fit 87 students inside for a new world record

Dr. Pete Klimley, a professor of marine sciences at UC Davis, warned California Department of Fish and Game and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration not to grant permission to the expedition, saying…

You’re taking an animal that’s two tons and which needs the water to support its weight, and suddenly removing it from its environment. Their internal organs could rupture, causing death days later, unborn pups inside a pregnant female could be squashed or forced out of their body

Even shark dive operations in the area have weighed in on the matter with Mick Menigoz, skipper of the cage diving boat Superfish saying…

We pushed for the new regulations, and we’ve bent over backwards for years to not hurt or bother the sharks. We’re not even allowed to approach them, and now they’re letting these guys come in and use baited hooks to catch them. I’d be surprised if they don’t kill one

And those fears came close to reality when the first shark caught by the team was hooked deep in the back of its mouth. After a 40 minute tussle the exhausted animal was hauled on board but it took 8 minutes to remove a fishing buoy from the shark’s mouth before a hose pumping sea water over its gills was able to be inserted. A pair of bolt cutters then had to be stuck through the gills to reach the hook where it was cut, leaving the business end still lodged in the fish’s throat.

Dr Michael Domeier, the marine biologist with the expedition likened the stress placed on the sharks to that placed on a bass when a fisherman catches and releases it. Above all he sees the research and the television programme as a vital part of plans to save the Great White, which is listed as an endangered species.

…this is a show about real science, not science created for TV, which is so often the case

Others, such as Sean Van Sommeran, an independent Santa Cruz researcher with the Pelagic Shark Research Foundation, don’t have such a rosy view either of the methodology or the science…

If you were to hook a protected species of two-ton marine mammal and drag it onboard a boat, people would go through the roof. Speaking facetiously, I might call his study ‘Flight Behavior of White Shark with a Barbed Hook in Its Gut

It remains to be seen what sort of data Domeier will gather from the tags, which are placed on the dorsal fin by drilling holes through the fin and then bolting them on. One thing that probably can be counted on is the National Geographic, who have always seen sharks and nazis as catnip to viewers, have probably got a ratings winner on their hands. And in those circumstances the research will, no doubt, be heralded by the Society as “groundbreaking”.

I’ll leave you with a picture of the “scientific expedition” hard at work.

Yee Hah! We're doing science... high five!!

Controlling the symbols of power: Who decides?

Obamao! Lmao!

We are constantly surrounded by all sorts of symbols, so much so that we seldom stop to consider their meanings or their effects on us until someone points them out. But perhaps we should pay more attention, because symbols have power. If they didn’t, governments wouldn’t attempt to censor and control any number of them. Although many of these may seem failrly innocuous to most of us, here’s a few examples that have caught my eye in last few weeks; all of the following provide an illustration of the attempts by those in power to control various “threatening” symbols and images:

1)      The Chinese government has tried to shut down vendors selling popular “Obamao” screen-printed t-shirts. The image is an amalgam of Obama and Mao (see pic). The official reason for this censorship is that that the Chinese are worried about offending the visiting president. Unofficially it is thought that the politburo has become worried about the cult of personality that is developing around Barack Obama, particularly what he might represent to the young in terms of democracy.

2)      Meanwhile, in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, shops displaying images of Fatah-aligned Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas have been warned to take them down. Some symbols are ok, however, as you can buy battery-powered, dancing Osama Bin Laden dolls (made in China).

3)      Soviet and communist era images and iconography are coming in for scrutiny in the former Soviet satellites where there is fear of a communist resurgence. This resurgence is driven by a nostalgia for the old regime that is taking hold as the recession bites hard in many of these countries. Slavoj Zizek reports in The New York Times that: “This new anti-Communist scare even goes after symbols. In June 2008, Lithuania passed a law prohibiting the public display of Communist images like the hammer and sickle, as well as the playing of the Soviet anthem. In April 2009, the Polish government proposed expanding a ban on totalitarian propaganda to include Communist books, clothing and other items: one could even be arrested for wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt.”

"Sieg Heil, waxy Hitler dude."

4)      German critics, including the mayor of Berlin, have become worried about a wax figure of Hitler at the Berlin branch of Madame Tussauds. To assuage fears about this symbol “Madame Tussauds spokeswoman Ruoss said visitors would not be able to pose with the Hitler figure, which would be sealed off and be under camera surveillance.” So the behaviour in the accompanying photo would be right out of order! We must remember, however, that Nazi iconography has been banned in Germany since WWII.

5)      Wax symbols are obviously quite a big problem. In another recent case, the German and Israeli ambassadors to Thailand protested about the use of an image of Hitler on a billboard that was promoting a waxworks. Accompanying the image was the caption: “Hitler is not dead.” The Thais apologised and removed the billboard, explaining that “the use of Nazi imagery does not stir the same emotional reaction in Asia as it does in the West.” Because of this lack of historical connection to Hitler’s atrocities the report states that it is not uncommon in Thailand “for icons of the genocidal German regime to be used in advertising and entertainment.” That would explain why there is a watering hole in Pattaya called the Nazi Bar.

6)      Last week, the Christian symbol of the cross, or crucifix, was deemed to be inappropriate in Italian schools after an atheist took a case to the European Court of Human Rights. The Court ruled that crucifixes in Italy’s public school classrooms violate the “principle of the secularism of the State”. This has provoked outrage across Italy where politicians and public alike have preached about how much meaning the crucifix has in Italian culture. Interestingly enough, it was the Fascists and not the Catholic church that originally legislated that the crucifix must appear in all school classrooms.

*******

As can be seen from these examples, it is not just authoritarian or communist regimes that seek to control images and symbols, it is also liberal democracies. Even France, the birthplace of Enlightment era ideals has controlled the wearing of the Muslim headscarf, the hajib, in schools because it symbolises an un-French way of life.

When pointed out en masse like this, many of these official reactions to symbols can seem quite childish, particularly when you consider that it is supposedly intelligent people in positions of power who are deciding what to control. And often it becomes apparent  in any decision to control symbols that there is a substantial dose of fear and paranoia at work.

But this is only one side of the “symbol equation.”  There is another aspect to the control of symbols that receives less attention, mainly because it is less obvious. This aspect is the way in which governments and politicians employ symbols for their own ends — namely as a means of ideologically controlling their populations.

In order to demonstrate this process, in the second part of this investigation into the power of symbols and symbolism, tomorrow I’ll be looking more closely at the launch last week of the newest naval vessel in the American fleet, the USS New York.

Part II: Symbolism in Action: Seven tons of World Trade Center steel in the USS New York

Happy Birthday LSD!

LSD turned 71 yesterday! Albert Hofmann first synthesised the drug 71 years ago on 16th November 1938. He wasn’t actually looking for the key to the “Doors of Perception” but trying to discover a respiratory and circulatory stimulant. He didn’t realise what he’d made either as he shelved the substance until Read more »

So you think your dog is smart?

So they can run and fetch stuff and you’ve trained them to carry your paper home from the shops… big deal. I notice you still have to bend down and pick their crap up every time you take them for a walk still.

If you want a really smart pet, it might be time to think of getting a dolphin. Dolphins brains are 25% bigger than humans for a start (although having a brain 25% larger than some humans I know is nothing to write home about) and they don’t sniff your visitors’ Read more »

Lost Army Found

Sometimes, submerged beneath the mountain of Celebricrap™, a genuine news story can startle and amaze.

Recently it’s been revealed that a pair of Italian of archaeologists has uncovered what may be the remains of a 50,000 strong army sent by Persian King Cambyses II to attack Read more »

The Ten Hottest Actresses of the Decade

10. Kirsten Dunst ( Age 27) — Kicked off the decade with Bring It On (2000), and hit the big time in the blockbuster Spiderman (2002) movies. Dunst reminds me of a younger version of Cameron Diaz in that they both do cute-sexy-funny better than anyone else.
 ********** Read more »

Girls, Lingerie and Money? Stop the Presses!

Modern commentators often bemoan the current state of journalism.

They often point to the lowering of journalistic standards due to budget constraints, an obsession with celebrity culture and an over-reliance on stories designed purely to shock or titillate. If only journalists had the same integrity they had in the good old days then politicians would be held to account, investigative reporting would uncover Read more »

Does Everyone have a Skeleton in the Cupboard?

Okay… so in the last two days we have seen Carrie Prejean suddenly drop her lawsuit against the Miss USA pageant when they played her a tape she once made for a boyfriend. The tape, which shows Prejean performing an act which Read more »

Women can’t jump. It’s not ladylike and they might hurt themselves

I really thought we were beyond the bullshit of excluding women from competing in certain sporting events at the elite level. Once it was discovered that women didn’t fall over dead if they ran further than Read more »

Well I Never…

Ever wondered how an armadillo spends their day?

Thanks to the Museum of Animal Perspectives you can now find out…

Recession: The Bitter Price We Pay

Some horrifying news has reached The Notes from Trinidad and Tobago where the firm that owns Angostura Bitters has been hit by a liquidity crisis. The factory that has produced the vital ingredient in Manhattans and Pink Gins since 1824, was forced to cease production in June and panic buying has meant shelves are rapidly emptying around the world.

Caution Sobriety Ahead

The chief executive of Angostura USA, the North American distributer, has said production will come back on line soon thanks to a re-financing deal but you can’t whip a bottle of bitters up overnight… this ancient brew takes time and supply could take up to a year to return to normal. The only solution is to race down to the local liquor store and hope you can nab a few bottles before the rest of the panickers get there.

Needless to say, I panicked last week and am currently sitting on a case of the stuff. Any offers?